>[Hermit to Everett] You seem to have ignored observed 
>experimental results in formulating your un-theory. Thus 
>your starting point can hardly have any relevance to 
>"factual existence" as it is not based upon any reality of
>which I am aware.

I think you may have misunderstood... Perhaps Everett was
using special Hallian definitions of "factual" and/or of
"existence". And thus the whole sentence made complete
sense, and was entirely correct.
Please read 'Cryptonomicon' by Neal Stephenson, or the
*real* Cryptonomicon to discover methods that can be used
to discern what the particular meaning is of such code
words.
After extensive examination and calculation of all that
has been written by Everett, I concluded that the decoded
meaning of "factual existence" was "Discord everywhere".

This may seem not to make sense in the sentence:
"This has to be the starting point for any system that is
going to address the fundamental nature of factual existence."
But you have to realise that Everett's mode of speech is to
redefine *all* words used... Not only that, but the same word
used twice may not have the same meaning - this effect is one
of the basic principles of cryptography - any consistent
pattern would make the code near-worthless.
The entire sentence, my decryption program suggests, has
a fair probability of translating to:
"By repeating my statements and ignoring questions regarding
my statements, it's clear to me that I can help spread 
discord everywhere."

A short Perl script to translate Everettian is as follows...
-----------------------
$dictfile='<filename of your newline-separated word list>';
open(HANDLE,$dictfile);
@words=<HANDLE>;
close(HANDLE);
$everettfile=$ARGV[0]; #program takes a text file of Everettian
                       #as a parameter
open(HANDLE,$everettfile);
@everett=<HANDLE>;
close(HANDLE);
$everett=join('',@everett);
srand();
$everett=~s/([A-Za-z\-]*)/$words[rand($#words)]/eg;
print $everett;
-----------------------

Note that this script does not respond with 100% certainty
as to the meaning of any particular Everettian document.
If run a sufficient number of times, and the resulting
output compared statistically, you will have a *far* better
understanding of what Everett is saying than if you try to
figure out the meaning from the untranslated words.

Enjoy,
--RavenBlack

PS. There may be typos in the Everett-translator script,
which any competent Perl-coder can spot and fix.
It could certainly be written more efficiently, but it
was written this way for readability.