DVQ: But I wonder why you were sufficiently interested to repeatedly 
check your own IQ, especially when you say it's a virtually 
meaningless and unfair concept?
RB: I wasn't sufficiently interested so much as sufficiently bored.
Obs:  Next time, have a wank instead.
Ah, the wonders of socially unacceptable interruptions to reasoned
discourse. The sweet scent of "Ravin"(?). The sheer joy of people
who openly demonstrate their lack of thought on a subject.

Perhaps next time, I _shall_ "have a wank"... But wait! I was
at work, as was evidenced by the next few sentences. Such
behaviour would be illegal! 

By golly, I'm glad _I_ have enough intelligence to consider 
consequences of actions before doing them, or, indeed, before 
ordering someone I don't know (and whose name I can't spell 
when I attempt to mock it with poorly thought out childish 
wordplay) to do.

Oh, now I understand - the words 'Black' and 'Crap' are so 
similar that it could even be a genuine mistake! I mean,
they're both one syllable, both have the letter 'a' in them,
and... er... only about another 80 words match those criteria.

Oh, I see! You thought that rewording someone's name would
make them appear stupid and you appear clever! Yes, you're
quite right. I hang my head in shame, for my name has been
reworded foolishly. Alas.

So sad,
--RavenBlack